Shahar Avin is an Assistant Research Professor at the University of Cambridge Institute for Technology and Humanity (across the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk and the Leverhulme Centre for the Future of Intelligence), where he has studied catastrophic risk, primarily from AI, for a decade. He co-founded Technology Strategy Roleplay (TSR), a charity spin-out from academic work that designs and runs roleplay simulation exercises about AI futures for decision makers, including Intelligence Rising and Science 2030, and serves as its Chief Science Officer. In 2025–26 he worked at the UK AI Security Institute on Systemic Safety and Societal Resilience.
Prior to CSER, Shahar worked at Google for a year as a mobile/web software engineer. His PhD was in philosophy of science, on the allocation of public funds to research projects. His undergrad was in physics and philosophy of science, which followed a mandatory service in the IDF. He has also worked at and with several startups over the years.
PhD in History and Philosophy of Science, 2014
University of Cambridge
BA + MSci in Natural Sciences, 2010
University of Cambridge
A short music video, made with Claude, that sings both sides of three AI questions and asks of each: what is it seeing, and what is it missing? With a teaching guide and every source.
A multiplayer card game that explore key tensions in AI strategy and race dynamics. Designed to be played with a regular card deck.
A strategic AI futures role-play exercise. Aimed at current and future AI decision makers. Designed to be facilitated for groups (in person or online) by domain specialists. Under continuous development by Technology Strategy Roleplay.
A mod that replaces the space victory with a science victory brought about by building an aligned artificial superintelligence. Adds the risk of developing an unaligned artificial superintelligence, which leads to human extinction. Developed by Shai Shapira.
A short quiz to help you figure out whether you should do a PhD.
Agent-based simulation of a community of investigators on an epistemic landscape with a central source of funding.
A silly web game made to explore the concept of authority in scientific decisions.